A+ Certification Requirements Essays - CompTIA, Free Essays

A+ Certification Requirements Essays - CompTIA, Free Essays A+ Certification Requirements REQUIREMENT #2 A + CERTIFICATION THE A+ CERTIFICATION PROGRAM IS A TESTING PROCEDURE PROVIDED BY COMPTIA - A CORPORATION THAT DEVELOPS VENDOR-NEUTURAL CERTIFICATIONS. THIS CERTIFIES THE COMPENTENCY OF ENTRY-LEVEL (6 MONTHS EXPERIENCE) COMPTER SERVICE TECHNICIANS. CERTIFICATION PROVIDES THE CREDIBILITY, RECOGNITION OF ACHIEVEMENT, AND QUALITY ASSUANCE OF THE INDIVIDUAL TO THE HIREING ORGINIAZITION. THE CERTICATION IS OPEN TO ANYONE WHO WISHES TO TAKE IT. THERE IS NO SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY; ALTHOUGH, THERE WILL BE A FEE OF $128.00 FOR EACH TEST. THIS PROGRAM IS PROVIDED BY COMPTIA AND IS BACKED BY MAJOR COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE VENDORS, DISTRIBUTERS, RESELLERS AND PUBLICATIONS. THE CONTENT OF THE TEST WAS DEVELOPED BY COMPTIA AND MAJOR COMPUTING VENDORS TO CREATE AN INDUSTRY STANDARD TO IDENTIFY THAT THE TECHNICIAN HAS THE PROPER KNOWLEDE AND SKILLS ESSENTIAL FOR A SUCCESSFUL ENTRY LEVEL POSITON AS DEFINED BY COMPANIY EXPERTS ACROSS THE INDUSTRY. THE COMPANIES THAT SUPPORT THE PROGRAM INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO; COMPAQ COMPUTER CORP., COMPUCOM, GATEWAY 2000, PACKARD BELL NEC EUROPE B.V., TANDY CORP., EASTMAN KODAK CO., IBM, LEXSMARK. COMPTIA CERTIFICATION TESTING IS ADMINISTERED BY THE WORLD WIDE NETWORKS OF PROMETRIC AND VUE. THE SACRAMENTO AREA TESTING LOCATIONS ARE NEW HORIZONS AND INFOTEC COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS, INC.. (SEE THE GROUP QUARTERBACK FOR SPECIFIC DETAILS). AS MENTIONED EARLIER, THE EXAM WILL CONSIST OF TWO PARTS. THE FORMAT IS AS FOLLOWS: THE DOMAINS FOR THE CORE HARDWARE EXAM ARE: DOMAIN PERCENT OF EXAM 1.0 INSTALLATION, CONFIGURATION 30% 2.0 DIAGNOSING AND TROUBLESHOOTING 25% 3.0 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE 05% 4.0 MOTHERBOARD / PROCESSORS / MEMORY 15% 5.0 PRINTERS 10% 6.0 BASIC NETWORKING 15% TOTAL 100% THE DOMAINS FOR THE OPERATING SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES EXAM ARE: DOMAIN PERCENT OF EXAM 1.0 OPERATING SYSTEM FUNDAMENTALS 30% 2.0 INSTALLATION, CONFIGURATION AND UPGRADING 15% 3.0 DIAGNOSING AND TROUBLESHOOTING 40% 4.0 NETWORKS 15% TOTAL 100%

Discipline and Punish Essays

Discipline and Punish Essays Discipline and Punish Essay Discipline and Punish Essay Essay Topic: Discipline and Punish the Birth Of the Prison In addition, although Foucault does not study the bureaucratic process in Weberian style, his studies of the prison and other social institutions go further than Weber in preparing the rational process for the administration of the carceral society. On the other hand, Foucaults work also appeals to the political imagination within sociology, presenting a model of powerless monumental than either those of Marx or Weber. What for Weber was a level of regulation and law, for Foucault becomes an open prison committed to abolishing the last dark corner in which the soul might hide and yet in which the resistance is everywhere (ONeill, 1986). One of the most prominent critiques of Foucault from a liberal and criminological perspective is of David Garland. He states, the work of Foucault is meaningful when comparing with Weber on rationalisation and Freud on civilization. Each showing a different perspective of how life is cherished living in the modern world (Garland 1986:848). He advises Foucaults work on power and discipline has attracted various agencies of health and education in developing their political analyses. On the other hand, Garland argues, that the power perception which he develops is a basic one, underpinning and enveloping all challenging explanations. He presents no quantitative or wide ranging evidence to support his classification of modern penal practise. In addition, Paul Patton agrees with Garland and believes Foucault can be criticised for failing to provide the evidence for the strong type of argument he stands for (Cited in Garland, 1986:871). However, Smart believed Foucault could not be criticized for his approach and ideas because he does not intend to present an assumption of social construction. Instead, he tries to expand our theoretical structure by disclosing possible alternative justifications for our present situation that may lead to theoretical creation. However, he does not see them as a replacement (Smart, 1985). Subsequently, Cohen explains, Foucault leaves us within the carceral society without the possibility of its transformation. He believes Foucault, as an author who is expertise at correlating social movements and institutional changes but does not allow enough explanation for the future. Cohen claims that Foucaults penology is in fact too basic and simple. However, Cohen (1985) remarks, Foucault veers between a materialist connection between prison and emerging capitalism and an idealist obsession with the power of ideas but he does agree with the fact that Foucault is more worried with the origins and effects of punishment than with its relations with the economy (Cited in Cavadino Dignan, 2002:69). Consequently, Critiques of Foucault are mainly revolved around his ideas of self-freedom from discipline. It is argued that he did not go in to enough depth in explaining the struggle between individuality and society and Foucault refused to give a reason for the struggle that existed or a goal to be obtained. On the other hand, theorists like Matheisen agreed with Foucault to some extent but varied in other. Matheisen believed the use of technologies like surveillance is an essential element of social control and quite apart from being an unpreventable part of modernity it does not have as well as repressive potential. The constant use of surveillance could be used to increase detection rates but there is no validity that it could be used to harsher penalties for those convicted (Cavadino Dignan, 2002). For all its restrictions, nevertheless, Foucaults method of approaching universal and fundamental social themes through discipline is a great achievement. He does not just write a history of crime and punishment but rather is using historical materials and sociological insights from Marx, Weber and Durkheim to construct his understanding and analysis of the social universe. In conclusion, Discipline and Punish so clearly illuminates and is so significant in understanding the communication between punishment and the disciplinary society. Foucault sees his book as a historical background to various studies of power, normalization and the formation of knowledge in society. Most readers will find Foucaults vision interesting, some will find it emotionally persuasive and yet others will consider its political implications. Therefore, it is evident to believe that Foucaults contribution has certainly transformed the sociology of punishment. Foucaults writing did have a central theme and it proves that his main idea was the struggle of individuals against the power of society. Word count = 1950 Bibliography Cavadino, M and Dignan, J. (2002), The Penal System: An Introduction, Sage Publications Ltd: London, Third Edition. Foucault, M. (1977), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Penguin Books: London. Garland, D. (1986), Foucaults Discipline and Punish: An Exposition and Critique, American Bar Foundation Research Journal, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 847-880. ONeill, J. (1986), The Disciplinary Society: From Weber to Foucault, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 42-60. Smart, B. (1983), Foucault, Marxism and Critique, Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd: London. Smart, B, (1985), Michel Foucault, Ellis Horward and Tavistock: London.

Compare and contrast Wilson and Truman Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Compare and contrast Wilson and Truman - Essay Example Wilson approach to military leaders was more based on his neutrality policy. During the First World War, President Wilson opted to remain strictly neutral. According to him, the underlying cause of the First World War was the militant nationalism of the greatest European power and the ethnic hatred that had engulfed both Central and Eastern Europe. During the early years of the war, America was experiencing a recession. President Wilson was more of a mediator when dealing with military leaders. During the First World War for instance, he offered to be a mediator between the Central powers and the Allies. He refused to build up the military forces in the United States in anticipation of a war threat. For this reason, he faced widespread criticism from Republican, led by Theodore Roosevelt. President Wilson directly made important military decisions on his own. For instance, when the German submarines began to kill sailors and civilian passengers, President Wilson personally demanded German stop. Despite this, he kept the United States out of this war. President Wilson was received more pressure from military leaders and American citizens to discard his neutrality policy after the sinking of the British passenger liner by the Germans. In the early 1917, he directed the military leader to adopt the unrestricted submarine warfare (Keylor 231). He eventually took America into the First World War after the revelation of the Zimmermann Telegram. President Wilson became more proactive with the military leaders. He gave direct commands to military leaders, including General John J. Pershing. On the other hand, President Truman is remembered for implementing a number of policies aimed at desegregating the Armed forces. He dealt with the military leaders in a neutral manner. In 1948, he signed an executive order that called for the desegregation of the military. He